More Thoughts on The Next Economic System
Presenters started out with their observation that
many-many people believe that the system is rigged against them…that the
economy only benefits the 1% of the world’s population. There is legitimate data to prove this. Right now, 62 families control (?) over 50%
of the world’s wealth. Much of the
wealth is actually trickling up to them and it’s not stopping. There is evidence that the present economic
system is flawed and that change is inevitable.
The reason for the conference is to encourage everyone to use their voice in deciding
what that next economy is going to be.
Economic models being addressed during the weekend conference included
Socialism, Modified Capitalism, a Hybrid Capitalist/Socialist, and Solidarity
Economic models. The CommonBound2016
made sure that everyone in attendance understand that they are NOT pushing one
system over another. Their intent for this
exploration is for everyone to evaluate present models and decide which could
be right for them. It must be a democratic decision made by all.
There are certains around what that next economic system
is going to entail. To avoid population
conflict (and probably violence) due to some inequality to access and benefit,
the next system must be inclusive.
Everyone must have a stake in its formulation and support. No one person or entity can benefit more than
another person. It must be earth
friendly in that we live on a finite planet with limited resources that every
living person now and in the future must have access to. The next economic system cannot be based upon
growth and expansion as these must overtax the earth’s resources as well as
human welfare. Since economic laws and
principles must be put into action, the next system must be democratic in
administration and thereby guaranteeing public input and assessment. The present economy does not address the
common good necessary for ecosystem and human well-being therefore the next system must be sustainable.
There were examples of new approaches to alternative economic solutions to problems. In one community in
Japan, housewives were concerned about their food quality coming from normal
stores. The housewives pooled their
money, paid a local farmer to convert his practices to organic and raise organic produce they were interested in
purchasing. The payment to the farmer was
based upon a fair compensation for his expenditures in both setting up and maintaining
his organic farm infrastructure. The
amount earned by the farmer allowed him to live comfortably with his
business and also allowed for a reinvestment back into his farm. The next system must involve local control
and decision making.
Since we are all in a “new frontier” of systemic economic crisis demanding
solutions, it was offered that the next economy must be in proper balance with
all forms of life and living systems; ecological, natural, and human. Rather than confine solutions to models
already known, it may appear as Hybrid Models whereby mixtures of theories
could be applied; i.e. socialism with capitalism…capitalism with democratic
economies…perhaps what Yugoslavia had in the 1980’s a market-driven socialism.
When individuals/collectives of cooperating individuals/families/extended families/familial communities are empowered to provide their own food, self-sufficient shelter and basic utility needs, vocations will likewise become community based and friendly. Current style factories (which could not long remain current style) would be in a position of having to answer to their workers desires, as workers would no longer have such dependency on having to have a job - especially any 'ole job.
ReplyDelete